In my posts on real-life examples of French conversation and in the post on , I’ve insisted on the importance of the very common subject pronoun “on.” It is also used often in advertising, as in Fig. 1, to add an informal touch to the message.
Because the teaching of French is generally biased towards the written language, the use of “on” for speaking is not often studied in detail. In fact, if you look at conjugation tables in most reference works, you will rarely see mention of “on.” Here, for example, is a typical table for the present indicative tense of the verb “être” (to be) with the various subject pronouns (je, tu, il, elle, etc.).
1st person sing. Je suis (I am) 2nd person sing. Tu es (You are) 3rd person sing. Il/Elle est (He/she is) 1st person plural Nous sommes (We are) 2nd person plural Vous êtes (You are) 3rd person plural Ils/Elles sont (They are)
Every student of French has learned this sort of table by heart. Not a bad idea, but this table is quite misleading. It does not contain the 3rd person singular form “On est” and it does not indicate that “On est” has a very unique property: it can replace all the other forms.
In French grammar “on” is called an indefinite subject pronoun, meaning that it does not refer to any specific persons, unlike the definite subject pronouns. But here’s the awesome part. The same indefinite “on” that refers to nobody in particular can be used instead of all the definite subject pronouns.
In both the written and written language a common use is the equivalent of the English pronoun “one.” For example:
You can find everything in this city. (One can find everything in this city.)
Since “one” is often considered old-fashioned or stilted in modern English, a lot of times “you”, “people” and “someone” are used instead. As in:
You can see the Notre Dame right. You can see the Notre Dame cathedral on your right.
In France we like to eat. In France people like to eat well.
In these cases, the speaker is generally an observer and is not included in the subject, as in:
A knock at the door. Someone's at the door.
In Fig 2, the use of “on” is a somewhat ambivalent. It could be indefinite, as we discuss here, or it could be a replacement of “nous” that we look at below
There is an absolutely delightful idiom “on ne peut plus” (literally: one cannot more) that means “extremely” as in:
It could not be more pleased. (She was extremely happy.)
This indefinite use of “on” is often used to express a meaning that in English often requires a passive form. Here are some examples:
On m’a dit de venir. (I was told to come.) On m’a donné un cadeau (I was given a gift.) On a trouvé un sac à main (A handbag was found.) Ici on parle beaucoup de langues (Many languages are spoken here.) On m’a posé beaucoup de questions, (People asked me lots of questions.)
In spoken French, especially fast informal language, users tend to use the simpler conjugation forms over and over again. What if you could use just one form subject pronoun and verb form in place of all the others?
Well, it’s not that simple. You couldn’t really have an entire conversation with “on” instead of “je, tu, il, etc.” But as you will see, that little “on” can do a lot.
In spoken French, the number one use of “on” is to replace the subject pronoun “nous” and the complicated verb forms. Every real-life example of French conversation in this blog contains many examples of this use. In fact, in colloquial French the “nous” verb forms have nearly completely disappeared. Here are some examples:
We are happy to see you. (We're happy to see you) We are currently assessing the situation. (We are Assessing the situation.) We asked for a modest increase. (We are modest answer asking for a raise) was thought to call you yesterday. (We were thinking of calling you yesterday.) We will come back. (We'll come back to this.)
In Fig. 3, notice how well put is the message, “We will be seeing each other more often.”
This is often used in questions. In a restaurant, the waiter could say:
Are we ready to order? (Are you ready to order?) Are we going to take wine (Are you going to Have some wine?) Are we finished here? (Are you finished?)
(Notice in passing that we have written “prêts à commander” with “prêts” in plural form because the real subject is plural. Generally speaking, where applicable, one should make the agreements with the real subject and not just with “on.”)
This use for “you’ is very common when giving instructions or orders.
So we go to page 25. (Go to page 25.) It is not that! (Do not do that.) It stands still. (Be quiet.) Madam, we are calm. (Please, ma'am, calm down.) Let's go! (Let's go).
This is the meaning in the Fig. 4.
Use of “on” to replace “je, il, elle, ils, elles” is not as common but certainly possible. In these cases there can be a touch of irony or formality. You could certainly say something like:
It is a good idea but we will think a little (It's a good idea purpose I have to think a bit.) So, young man, we want to be clever? (So, young man, you think you're so smart?) Everything was done quickly. We saw nothing. (Everything Happened quickly. They Did not see a thing.)
Because this “on” is so flexible and can mean so many different things, how do you know which is which? In many of the examples given above, the translations could have used other pronouns. The only way to determine the meaning is to look at the context.
Here is a great sentence with some possible translations:
On fait ce qu’on peut avec les moyens qu’on a. We’re doing everything we can with what we have. I’m doing everything I can with what I have. They’re doing everything they can with what they have.
All three translations are equally valid, The context will tell which one is appropriate. That said, the most likely meaning is the first one because in French conversation “on” is used mostly to replace “nous.”
Stanley Aléong is a polyglot, author, musician and language coach in French, English and Spanish. He likes to share his passion for languages and believes that anybody can learn to speak a foreign language well with the right methods and tools. He has also invented a cool visual learning tool called the that is based on his own learning experience. Reach him at info@langcal.com.
Liked this post? Follow this blog to get more.